Same Streets
← All stories

The Judge Who Was Too High to Rule

Washington state legislators launch an impeachment investigation into a Spokane judge accused of being a 'morphine fiend' who presided over court while intoxicated.

Impeachment proceedings began in the house today against Judge Jesse Arthur of the superior bench of Spokane and Stevens counties by the introduction of a resolution for the appointment of a committee to investigate the charges. The resolution charged Arthur with grave offenses in violation of his oath, and that he had disgraced himself and mortified citizens of his district by his conduct. The charges set forth that Arthur has debauched and perverted the administration of justice in many acts of gross misconduct, neglect of duty and malfeasance. During the spring of 1894, the grand jury of Stevens county was left for two or three weeks idle and without business, awaiting Arthur's presence to discharge them, thereby greatly increasing the cost to the county. That he has been guilty of repeated and protracted absences from duty as judge of Spokane county. Arthur's misconduct receives special attention in the charges: that he has been notoriously and habitually in an intoxicated condition, incident to the use of narcotics or stimulants, insomuch that he is commonly spoken of as a morphine fiend. His judicial blunders and carelessness while in such condition have repeatedly jeopardized the interests of the state. Abundant proof can be furnished as to his stupid, drunken, maudlin condition while on the bench administering justice to the great disgust of those forced to appear before him.

“Abundant proof can be furnished as to his stupid, drunken, maudlin condition while on the bench administering justice.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895
Then · 1895131 years apartNow · 2026

This 1895 scandal highlights the era's intense public scrutiny of judicial conduct and the early, often stigmatizing, language used to describe addiction. While modern judicial ethics boards handle such misconduct, the public outrage over a judge failing to perform their duties remains a cornerstone of civic accountability.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-02-13. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, FEB 13, 1895, Page 1
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.65900, -117.42502 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗