Same Streets
← All stories

Bondholders Ask Seattle for More Track, More Time

With Pike Street paving looming, the receiver and first-mortgage bondholders of the Lake Street railway seek a longer franchise to reorganize, rebuild and keep the line solvent.

The first mortgage bondholders of the Lake Street railway met with a committee of the city council yesterday afternoon to ask for a longer franchise. The road is in the hands of a receiver, and its representatives say it cannot meet the city's demand that it pay its share of paving Lake Street and Pike Street unless it can reorganize. Receiver M. K. Backus said the condition of the consolidated road is serious: the city is requiring it to repave and pay its portion of Pike Street paving, and the treasury will not permit the expense. The cost would fall on the first mortgage bondholders, whose representatives — N. W. Harris and G. W. Bartol — are in Seattle to see what can be done. They favor a reorganization that protects Seattle interests, second mortgage bondholders and secured creditors, while allowing the first mortgage holders to reissue bonds on the company's property. That, Backus said, is impossible under the present short franchise. The company also wants to improve the road and rolling stock and extend its line somewhat. Improvement of Pike Street would involve an entire reconstruction of the railway through that thoroughfare, since it would not do to pave over the present inferior construction. "We need a longer franchise," the gentlemen said. Harris and Bartol expressed themselves freely, saying they had confidence in the future of the city and were prepared to raise such sums as might be required to improve the streets through which the company's lines extend, if the council would grant an extension enabling them to float securities when better times arrive and make their investment remunerative. Thomas P. Shepard warned the committee that the profits were so deeply involved that something must be done. The committee adjourned without taking action; the matter is expected to come before the full council on Monday.

“We need a longer franchise.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895
Then · 1895131 years apartNow · 2026

The Lake Street railway fight is a reminder that transit franchises are never just about tracks: they are about who pays for the street, who controls the right-of-way, and how much public risk is shifted to private bondholders. Seattle still argues over those same terms every time a rail line or street improvement is proposed.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-05-11. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, MAY 11, 1895, Page 8
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60898, -122.33967 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗