A Seattle Pastor on Trial: 'Attentions' to Another Woman, Harsh Words at Home, and a Public Rebuke
In 1877, the Presbytery of Puget Sound spent six days in Seattle deciding whether Rev. E. P. Dunning had crossed the line with another woman and mistreated his wife — then publicly reproved him and urged him to guard his conduct.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Presbytery of Puget Sound has for the last seven days been in session in Seattle, engaged in trying Rev. E. P. Dunning. Rev. G. F. Whitworth was appointed by the court to assist the prosecutor, Mr. Reuben L. Doyle, and Rev. Dr. Geary, of Eugene City, Oregon, as counsel for Mr. Dunning. The evidence was all in on Monday night, and the Presbytery made its final judgment yesterday afternoon. We have been furnished with the following official copy of the findings and judgment of the Court:
In the case of Reuben L. Doyle against Rev. H. P. Dunning, prosecuted before the Presbytery of Puget Sound under two charges: First, of paying attentions to a lady other than his wife, and the matters cognate thereto in amended specifications I, III and V. Second, by abusive, ill-treatment of his wife and wilful neglect of family worship, &c., under amended specifications II and IV. The Court, after patiently listening to the testimony, and the arguments of counsels on both sides, for six days, and after prayerful consideration of the whole case and careful examination of the testimony, find the first charge admitted to the extent expressed in the following paper, which was laid before the Presbytery by the accused and adopted as meeting all the requirements of that case, and presenting just grounds for staying all proceedings under charge first, to wit:
"To the Presbytery of Puget Sound: Dear Brethren — In regard to the charge of paying attentions to a lady other than my wife, now preferred against me before the Presbytery, I beg to state that inasmuch as the prosecution has disavowed any intention to attempt to prove any criminal intent in said attentions or give sanction to any reports of actual criminality that may be in circulation, I do frankly and sorrowfully admit that I now fully realize that I did not exercise due caution in my actions and a proper regard for the results of such indiscretions. And no man can regret more than I do every act that has had a tendency to injure the cause of Christ. — H. P. Dunning."
The Court unanimously find the second charge sustained in part, and adopted the following paper as expressive of said findings:
"The Court find the charge against the accused of 'abusive, ill-treatment of his wife' not sustained to the extent of personal violence; but sustained to the extent of harsh words while under the excitement of temper, aroused by accusations injurious to his character as a husband and a Christian minister. The Court find the charge against the accused of 'neglecting family worship' not sustained to the extent of its being constant or habitual, but that family worship was sometimes omitted on account of matters over which he had no control. The Court also find that on a single occasion the accused did not ask a blessing, or give thanks, in connection with the taking of a regular meal. In consequence of the above finding, Presbytery decided upon the following as their judgment: The judgment of the Presbytery is that Rev. H. P. Dunning shall be reproved in open Presbytery by the Moderator for the conduct which has led to the foregoing findings of the Court; and admonished to set a guard upon himself that he transgress no more in appearance or word; ever remembering that the honor of our Lord is solemnly committed to his care, that the eyes of the world are upon him, that the welfare of immortal souls may be jeopardized by his conduct, that the minister of Jesus Christ should ever be a shining light reflecting the blameless life of his Divine Lord and Master, and that the domestic circle of the under-shepherd of Christ's flock should never be aught less than a model Christian home."
No. R. Thompson, Moderator. M. G. Hexx, Clerk pro tem.
The judgment of Presbytery being read to the defendant, he presents the following submission thereto, which he read in open Court:
"Mr. Moderator and Brethren of the Presbytery — I do, with a deep sense of regret, and I trust with that Godly sorrow which worketh repentance into life, thank you for your kind and fraternal course in treating the difficulties which have rested so heavily upon me for many months past, and which have led to the indulgence of severe and improper language by me. I especially regret and deplore the wounds thus given to the cause of my Redeemer, and the impediment it has placed in the way of my usefulness as a minister of the Gospel; and I further declare that being taught my infirmity and in reliance on the grace of God, my Saviour, I hope never so to offend again. I submit to your judgment and ask that this my voluntary and unsolicited expression be made a part of the record of Presbytery. — H. P. Dunning."
Mr. Dunning was then reproved and admonished in accordance with the sentence.
“I do frankly and sorrowfully admit that I now fully realize that I did not exercise due caution in my actions and a proper regard for the results of such indiscretions.”
A minister publicly tried for paying attention to another woman and for harsh words toward his wife is a 19th-century version of the accountability questions that still shadow clergy and public figures today. The Presbytery's sentence — a public rebuke and admonition rather than defrocking — shows how an earlier Seattle community tried to balance reputation, discipline and the possibility of repentance.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.