The Husband Who Had Enough: A Domestic Dispute of 1877
A rare 19th-century report of a King County man seeking divorce on the grounds of domestic abuse, citing his wife's 'cruel and inhuman treatment.'
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
This time the tables are turned. The husband sues for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Mr. Dingle, of King county, in his complaint sets forth that his wife has been in the habit of beating, kicking and dragging him over the floor as if he were a mop. He alleges, also, that she frequently armed herself with a butcher knife and threatened to use it on him; in fact, she has altogether been too lively for an agreeable life-partner.
“he alleges, also, that she frequently armed herself with a butcher knife and threatened to use it on him; in fact, she has altogether been too lively for an agreeable life-partner.”
While Victorian-era reports of domestic violence often centered on men beating women, this brief mention of 'Mr. Dingle' highlights how infrequently the legal system addressed abuse against husbands at the time. Today, the conversation around intimate partner violence has expanded to recognize that survivors of all genders deserve support and legal recourse, though the public tone in the 1870s clearly leaned toward mocking the victim.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.