The Wild West of Washington Journalism
When the courts declared they had no power to punish libel, Seattle editors went to war with their pens—and their reputations.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Grand Jury this morning presented to the Court a true bill of indictment against Thomas W. Prosch, editor of the Tribune, for a malicious libel upon the senior editor of this paper. The Prosecuting Attorney was met by the Court with the statement that the Statutes of the Territory, while defining the offense, had prescribed no remedy or measure of punishment for the crime. This leaves the most valued portion of every citizen's possessions—his private character—at the mercy of any malicious scoundrel who may choose to assail it. In our paper, we were specifically charged with a dastardly felony: a forgery committed in the name of the Chief Justice. Prosch claimed the forgery was in our handwriting, and that the Court and Grand Jury believed us guilty. The Grand Jury conducted a thorough investigation, examining a score of witnesses including the Judge and members of the bar, without eliciting a single fact in support of the infamous charges. Now, Prosch attempts to avoid trial by arguing the law provides no penalty for libel, essentially lobbying for a legal license to ruin reputations. We are left with the chilling conclusion that when the law offers no redress for the assassination of one's character, men are left to the arbitrament of force.
“The newspaper press of Washington Territory has achieved an infamous notoriety. No public man, from the Chief Justice to a ward Constable, has been exempt from its malicious slanders.”
The 1878 struggle with 'fake news' and the weaponization of the press mirrors modern concerns about digital accountability and the erosion of local media standards. Just as the Weekly Dispatch decried a legal loophole that shielded slanderers, modern debates over Section 230 and libel law show that the tension between free speech and character protection remains a defining feature of the American public square.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.