The Great Seattle Railroad Swindle
How corporate speculators and land rings bypassed honest stockholders and plundered the future of the city's waterfront.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Tacoma Herald, in speaking of the speeches made on the Northern Pacific Railroad bill, says: 'Mr. Windom's speech was by far the most influential of the number. He presented the subject in its most comprehensive light, uninfluenced as he was by pledges or professions of loyalty to the demands of any particular line.' His steadfastness is good, but his connection with the company most of the time as a director, when it was notoriously under the control of a land ring, composed of private speculators who used the subsidy to advance their own personal fortunes in utter disregard of the interests of the public or the stockholders, suggests a conflict. The citizens of Seattle pledged to the Commissioners appointed to locate the western terminus of the railroad a bonus in cash and lands which could readily be made available for $700,000, to locate the terminus at this place, which every Director of the company regarded as the most suitable place for such location. By accepting this proposition, the company would have acquired 512,000 acres more land, the immediate cash value of which would not have been less than $1,280,000. Instead, the donations passed directly into the pockets of the land ring, and the honest stockholders of the railroad have never profited a dollar by them. What have Mr. Windom and his colleagues done with the $30,000,000 of actual cash put into this enterprise by 8,500 innocent stockholders? This is a question founded upon indisputable facts, which it belongs to Mr. Windom to answer.
“The town sites which were donated to the company and by the Directors transferred to the land ring gratuitously; thus robbing the honest stockholders and bondholders of their rights.”
This 1877 account of the Northern Pacific 'land ring' reflects a perennial Seattle anxiety: the fear that the city's strategic geography is being auctioned off by powerful interests rather than built for the public good. The tension between private land speculation and public infrastructure remains a central theme in Seattle's political identity.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.