The Port Townsend Sewer of Defamation
A small-town attorney attempts to build a media empire on vitriol and libel, only to be dismantled by the Governor he targeted.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
For more than a year past, a newspaper has been published at Port Townsend, ostensibly as an organ of the Democratic party, but really nothing but a sewer of personal defamation. It was open to anybody, of any party, who chose to use it to vent personal spleen and vituperative abuse upon others, regardless of public or private decency, age, sex, party association, or social condition. The whole purpose was manifestly to imitate the low, sensational journals which gain notoriety and circulation by pandering to a groveling popular appetite for that class of literature which is tabooed in circles where morality and social decency are respected. One H. L. Blanchard, a small attorney with no knowledge of the business either as a printer or editor, undertook the management of this infamous enterprise. Under the impression that as the statutes of the Territory failed to provide any punishment for the crime of libel, he could ply the vocation of a common libeller with impunity, he did not take into account that the law gave the offended citizen the remedy of a suit for personal damages. Governor Ferry, who had been grossly charged through this medium with high crimes in office, commenced a suit against the editor as the only means of vindicating his character. The suit has resulted in a humming confession of guilt and prayer for Executive clemency. While this vindicates the Governor, it leaves the criminal at liberty to repeat his practices upon others, and without demanding a surrender of his associates to public odium.
“He did not take into account that the law which failed to provide punishment for the crime gave to the offended citizen the remedy of a suit for personal damages.”
This 1878 clash over 'fake news' and the weaponization of independent media reflects today's ongoing tension between the democratization of information and the unchecked spread of online defamation. While the legal landscape has shifted significantly regarding libel, the desire to hold public figures accountable—and the danger of bad-faith actors masquerading as 'the press'—remains a cornerstone of the Washington political experience.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.