Same Streets
← All stories

The War Over the Desert Water

An irrigation landowner at White Bluffs vows a 'fight to a finish' against corporate power companies for reneging on water contracts.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

I would like to have it clearly understood, if it is of any interest to the public, that I am in this fight to a finish and that I will stay with the farmer in my district until the last is cat-skinned if it costs me every dollar I have invested in that district. The fight for the preservation of our rights against the improper methods being pursued by the Power company in not carrying out the contracts originally made with the farmers of our district is one that should be continued until a successful issue is obtained. This is no time for weakening on the part of any man who has property rights in that district. Our contracts are perfectly good in the eyes of the law, and will be shown to be good. The only thing that will make them otherwise will be the weakening on the part of the landowner himself. Personally, I am of the opinion that this fight is nearly over. I cannot conceive of business men, either big or little, continuing such an useless and losing campaign as has been, and is being carried on by the Power company. I am quite of the opinion further that, if the people who have invested their money in the bonds of the corporations directly and indirectly interested in the Priest Rapids project and the Hanford Irrigation project, and other corporations of convenience created by their managers, knew of the facts in connection with the improper business methods pursued by their managers in these transactions, that they would be told promptly to put themselves in the right position. In my opinion, the interests now controlling the Hanford project and the Priest Rapids project are what are termed 'Big Business Interests.' It is inconceivable to me that representatives of 'big business' cannot and do not see that the public does, at all times, want to give them a square deal, but when they do not reciprocate square dealing, they are creating a feeling against 'big business' which manifests itself at the polls.

“I am in this fight to a finish and that I will stay with the farmer in my district until the last is cat skinned if it costs me every dollar I have invested in that district.”

— Printed in White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, 1916
Then · 1916110 years apartNow · 2026

The struggle between Hanford settlers and the irrigation power companies highlights the early tensions of land ownership in the arid Columbia Basin. Today, those same historic water rights and corporate land management legacies remain at the center of regional debates over development, agriculture, and environmental stewardship.

The original page

White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, 1916-01-14. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, JAN 14, 1916, Page 4
Rights
Public domain
Place
46.66064, -119.47961 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗