Yakima Attorney Makes the Case for State Capital
A prominent local attorney explains why Yakima should be the new capital of Washington Territory.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
W. J. Milroy, of Yakima, arrived in the city yesterday and remained over Sunday. He is a son of General Milroy and is a promising young attorney. To a reporter he stated that Yakima people would have much preferred to have the question of locating the state capital deferred for a year or so, but since the constitutional convention has provided otherwise, the people of Yakima will place the facts before the people and abide the result. He doubted whether any place would be decided upon by the first ballot, although he thought Yakima would certainly stand first on the list and ultimately be agreed upon. He based this view upon the fact that Yakima is the most accessible point from all directions and is so situated that all roads must cross there if the several practicable passes through the Cascade mountains are ever used. He argued that the intersection of the Southern Pacific, the Northern Pacific, and potential future lines from the Big Bend or Gray's Harbor made the Yakima Valley the natural hub of the new state.
“Yakima is the most accessible point from all directions and is so situated that all roads must cross there.”
In 1889, North Yakima was aggressively campaigning to become the state capital, using its geographic centrality as its primary pitch. While Olympia eventually retained the title, the historical debate underscores how early Washington town-builders used infrastructure and 'boosterism' to define their city's worth.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.