The Great Sewer Scandal (Apr 21, 1892)
A contractor and a city engineer trade accusations of threats and incompetence in a public, printed spat.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The city council met in regular session Monday evening. The city engineer’s report was read and ordered printed in The Herald. City Engineer William H. Redman reported that the sewer system work by contractor R. Schmidt was far behind schedule and that the quality of work was poor. Redman stated: 'I have been cursed and vilified and blackguarded on the work... and my life threatened.' Contractor Schmidt emphatically denies threatening the engineer's life and claims he was merely demanding that the work be done according to contract. Councilman Miller requested that Schmidt pay the expenses for the engineer and inspector due to the delays.
“I have been cursed and vilified and blackguarded on the work... and my life threatened.”
Public works disputes were as heated in the 1890s as they are today, showing that municipal infrastructure projects remain a flashpoint for civic tension. The practice of printing the city engineer's report directly in the local paper is a stark reminder of how transparent—and public—these civic battles were.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.