The Price of a Monopoly: A $16,000 Legal Battle over Walla Walla Gas
A Spokane attorney claims he is owed thousands for brokering a deal that reshaped the city’s utility landscape, exposing the high-stakes game of regional franchise control.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Attorney H. M. Glidden of Spokane has filed suit in the superior court for a judgment against Cyrus Pierce and Company for commissions in arranging a deal with the Walla Walla Gas and Electric Company, alleging a breach of contract. He asks for $16,000 in principal and $2,500 in interest from December 1, 1902, as well as $13,500 in principal and interest from January 2, 1903. Glidden in his complaint alleges that the property and franchises acquired by the deal negotiated by him from the Walla Walla Gas and Electric Light Company are of great value and that the amount asked by him for his services is only just compensation.
“Glidden in his complaint alleges that the property and franchises to be acquired by the deal... are of great value.”
Early 20th-century Walla Walla was a battleground for the control of essential infrastructure, where local franchises were traded like commodities by distant holding companies. This legal dispute over brokerage fees offers a rare glimpse into the opaque, transactional nature of the consolidation that eventually led to modern utility regulation.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.