The Executor Who Tore Down the House
When a court ordered an executor to account for an estate, he decided to simply remove the buildings from the land entirely to bypass the judge.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A legal controversy that had its beginning last May when P. B. Dowding, as executor of the estate of Catherine Dowding deceased, was, on application of M. Flohr, guardian of Ellen Rorke, insane, cited by the judge of the superior court to account for the management of the affairs of the said ward, had an abrupt ending yesterday. Responsive to the citation the executor filed an account showing the ward to be indebted to him in the sum of $1779.50. Two supplemental and amendatory accounts were filed in the case. The matter after being twice argued was finally submitted to the court. It was claimed by the executor that there was due him $1950.50; on the other hand the guardian contended that nothing was due Mr. Dowding, but that his ward was entitled to receive $622.98 for revenue and receipts of her property unaccounted for. The court on October 5 ruled that the executor should forthwith vacate the lands of the ward and allowed him $71.12 to pay the costs. A petition was then filed by the executor asking that he be allowed to show that certain expenditures for repairs that had been disallowed by the court in the account were in reality sums paid for the actual construction of new buildings and that he be allowed to remove the same. This petition was set for hearing yesterday. When the case was called it was disclosed that Mr. Dowding between the time of the application and the time set for the hearing had removed all the buildings from the ward's land, and his attorney moved for a dismissal of the petition. The motion was resisted by the guardian, who asked that the value of the property removed be assessed and charged to the executor. The judge held that the matter had gone beyond the jurisdiction of the probate branch of the court and that the guardian would be compelled to resort to an action for trespass.
“The judge held that the matter had gone beyond the jurisdiction of the probate branch of the court and that the guardian would be compelled to resort to an action for trespass.”
This case highlights the messy intersection of estate management and mental health guardianship. Even today, the vulnerability of those under guardianship remains a significant point of civic and legal debate, showing how easily those with 'authority' can exploit gaps in the probate system.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.