The Great County Road Grift
A skeptical resident argues that the proposed county road bond is a pork-barrel scheme that ignores the actual needs of the region's infrastructure.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
There was not the first effort made to get together and lay out a system of roads that would be of the greatest benefit to Chehalis county as a whole. From the moment they were called to order until they adjourned, it was a continuous quarrel to see who could get the most. Does any voter suppose that the delegates from Elma stopped to care whether the roads Aberdeen wanted were the ones most needed by the county, so long as they could get the money to build the road or roads they wanted? I say no! It was just a grab. The records show that money has been spent equally east and west of Montesano, with the result that east of Montesano there are fairly good roads, while west of that city there are practically no roads. The only passable road on Grays harbor today, that I know of, is between Aberdeen and Hoquiam, and that road cost about six thousand dollars per mile. If the county board tries to build roads under this bond call, the tax payers will find that the county has a road bond debt saddled on it, with roads, or more properly trails, started in all directions and finished in none.
“It was just a grab, for each one to get the most, with never a thought or a consideration for a perfect system of roads.”
Infrastructure funding disputes in Grays Harbor County have a long history of pitting local municipalities against one another. This 1890s argument over 'pork-barrel' road spending echoes contemporary frustrations with regional transit and maintenance priorities.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.