Kennewick Demands Fair Share of Road Funds
The city challenges county commissioners to return a percentage of taxes for local street infrastructure.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Kennewick’s request of the county commissioners for 15 percent of the money which the city has paid into the general road and bridge fund since its incorporation may at first hand appear rather presumptive. When all facts are considered, there is nothing unreasonable about the demand. The statutes provide that county commissioners may expend 15 percent of road taxes paid by an incorporated town for the improvement of streets that are a continuation of county roads. The fact that Kennewick, Prosser, and Richland have not requested this aid until now does not abrogate their right to it. If granted, the money is to be used for the bridge recently constructed across the canal near the city limits, a vital link for local and through travel.
“The bridge is in the city limits, it is true, but it is a part of the main county road leading down the valley and is a necessity for the accommodation of travel.”
Municipalities often struggle to capture their fair share of regional tax revenue, a tension that remains central to Washington's local politics today. This 1914 argument over road funding reflects the ongoing struggle between city-specific infrastructure needs and county-wide budgetary discretion.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.