Same Streets
← All stories

Washington Territory Moves Toward a Constitutional Convention

Before Washington became a state, residents debated the necessity of a constitutional convention and the potential riches of federal land grants.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

From the returns so far received, there is a fair probability that the proposition for calling a state constitutional convention will be adopted. Some counties gave a majority against it, and possibly other counties along the Columbia voted adversely. The bulk of the vote on the Sound, however, was in its favor. With such a unanimity as to overbear all the opposition that was brought to bear against it in the areas most directly under the Oregon influence, it is not likely that the step is premature. Among the incidental advantages of Statehood may be mentioned the fact that we would then come into possession of five hundred thousand acres of land for purposes of internal improvement, also of all the swamp and over-flowed lands, which experience has demonstrated to be the richest of all, and likewise of about three million acres of lands for the benefit of the school fund. Year by year, as we continue in a state of Territorial vassalage, the best lands are settled and the purchase price is abstracted from the meagre exchequer of our pioneer communities into the hands of the national institutions and enterprises, and retained in circulation. There is also a considerable arrear of appropriations for rivers and improvements and to aid our railroads and canals which Congress ought to have made but has not done and probably never will until demanded by our full congressional delegation, clothed with plenary powers as members of that body.

“Year by year, as we continue in a state of Territorial vassalage, the best lands are settled and the purchase price is abstracted from the meagre exchequer of our pioneer communities.”

— Printed in The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1876
Then · 1876150 years apartNow · 2026

This 1876 editorial highlights a recurring tension in Washington's history: the struggle for local autonomy versus the limitations of being a territory (and later, a state) tethered to federal bureaucracy. Just as then-residents eyed land grants and school funding as the keys to prosperity, modern Seattleites grapple with the same fundamental question of how to leverage our land and resources to build a stable future.

The original page

The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1876-12-02. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, DEC 2, 1876, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗