Same Streets
← All stories

The Struggle for Tax Equity in 1876

A Seattle editorial argues that delinquent property taxes and legal loopholes are placing an unfair burden on the public, demanding legislative reform for the growing territory.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Today is the limit allowed by law to the taxpayer for the payment of his dues to the public fund, before being enrolled on the delinquent list and having ten percent added to his burden. It is to be deplored that there should be, every year, so large a delinquent list returned to the Sheriff for forced collection, and so large an amount annually going under the hammer, and in many instances falling to the county, which is thus forced, to that extent, to pay its own taxes. There must be some screw loose somewhere in the machinery of the revenue collection, or some defective procedure of judicial ruling which leads property owners thus to presume, as it were, upon a practical immunity from tax-paying.

Three modifications of the revenue law are needed. First, the costs of sale should be reduced to the minimum. Second, the certificate of purchase and tax-deed should bind the property irrespective of subsequent transfers of ownership or conflict of previous title. Third, within a reasonable time after the expiration of the limit of redemption, say seven years from the date of the deed, the statute of limitations should operate to give absolute validity to a tax deed uncontested within that period. The absentee property-holder derives certain benefits from the improvements that are developed around his property and toward which he contributes no share. He is thus enabled to reap where he has not sown.

“The absentee property-holder derives certain benefits from the improvements that are developed around his property and toward which he contributes no share. He is thus enabled to reap where he has not sown.”

— Printed in The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1876
Then · 1876150 years apartNow · 2026

This 1876 editorial highlights a perennial Seattle tension: the struggle between public infrastructure funding and the rise of absentee real estate speculation. Just as modern Seattleites debate the impact of 'flipping' and land banking on housing affordability, this piece argues that the system is broken when it allows owners to benefit from civic growth without contributing their fair share.

The original page

The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1876-12-30. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, DEC 30, 1876, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗