Same Streets
← All stories

Electrical Union Challenges Municipal Power Plans

Labor leaders clash with Seattle and Tacoma over non-union labor in municipal light and power projects.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Union labor leaders in the electrical industry have issued an open letter to all labor unions attacking the Bone public ownership bill, declaring that the economic interests of the electrical trade are in jeopardy. The labor movement has in the past and will in the future support any movement towards public ownership, but they will, as they demonstrated at the recent convention of the State Federation of Labor, withdraw support if the economic interest of any trade union is placed in jeopardy. Officials of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers point out that only non-union men are employed by the municipal lighting plants of Seattle and Tacoma and that conditions at both the Skagit and Cushman projects are deplorable from this point of view. The nonunion conditions, according to this appeal, do not apply only to the electrical workers, but it is seldom that a union man is employed and this includes carpenters, painters, truck-drivers, machinists, etc. We therefore feel justified in asking the rest of organized labor to come to our assistance, as we felt that we would have a prior claim in the labor movement above this political question.

“The labor movement has in the past and will in the future support any movement towards public ownership, but they will... withdraw support if the economic interest of any trade union is placed in jeopardy.”

— Printed in White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, 1924
Then · 1924102 years apartNow · 2026

This dispute highlights the friction between the era's push for municipal public ownership of utilities (like the Skagit River project) and the organized labor movement's insistence on union staffing. It serves as a reminder that the development of Washington's vast public hydro-electric power system was not just an engineering feat, but a heated political battle involving the rights and wages of the workforce.

The original page

White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, 1924-05-30. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, MAY 30, 1924, Page 3
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗