The Failed Promise of the Priest Rapids Valley
A state-funded colonization project for veterans struggles amidst allegations of mismanagement, isolation, and a collapsing public image.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
When Erle J. Barnes assumed charge of the departments of agriculture and conservation and development, he announced that his predecessors would remain to aid the transition. A primary concern for the new administration is the state-backed land settlement project in the Priest Rapids Valley. Initiated in 1919 with state appropriations to help veterans transition to farming, the project initially saw optimism. However, the project quickly became a site of intense controversy. Settlers debated the viability of the land, the high cost of irrigation water, and the effectiveness of state management. Rumors of failure caused new applicants to avoid the area, leaving dozens of tracts vacant and deteriorating. By the end of 1924, nearly $100,000 had been spent to improve the remaining plots in hopes of attracting settlers, but confidence remained low. Dr. Hinton D. Jones, a former state commander of the American Legion, noted that the resulting 'dissension' and conflicting reports from within the project itself effectively halted further colonization. As of April 1925, the legislature has provided emergency funds while awaiting a full investigation to determine if the state-funded dream of veteran autonomy should be abandoned entirely.
“It is needless to say, with this difference of opinion making the rounds of the State, the veterans who were contemplating settling there hesitated, and in the majority of instances lost interest entirely.”
The Priest Rapids Valley land settlement project reflects a recurring tension in Washington history: the intersection of state-sponsored development and the lived reality of those on the land. Today, this area is defined by the Hanford Site, illustrating how the region shifted from a failed agricultural experiment to a complex, federally controlled legacy site.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.