The Public Printer's Stand-Off
A legislative clerk threatened 'foul means' to seize official manuscripts from the printer, leading to a tense standoff over territorial records.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
It has been a matter of some conjecture since the meeting of the Legislature whether that august body belongs to certain attaches of the concern, or that the attaches to the Legislature. A few days ago, while we held the office of Public Printer, the annual reports of the Territorial officers were placed in our possession for printing. One of our hands falling ill, the work was unavoidably delayed, which fact we explained to the House by communication last week. On Thursday last, the Clerk of the House waited upon us and very curtly remarked that he was commissioned by the House to obtain the manuscript of the report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. We courteously replied that he could have the manuscript as soon as we could complete the report, which would be to-morrow (Friday). This did not satisfy the gentleman, who remarked that he 'wasn't sent to ask when it would be done, but to get it now; and that if he couldn't get it by fair means he would take it by foul means.' We, influenced by our known disposition to accommodate, advised him to resort to foul means, as the only alternative. The gentleman did not see fit to do this, and on Friday we delivered the report to the Sergeant-at-Arms, who informed us that the Clerk had volunteered his services to members of the House to await upon us and compel us to return the manuscript. This has not been the first attempt made to intimidate us by coarse threats. We profess to know our rights and if necessary we dare defend them. We have no disposition to meddle with the affairs of others, and will permit no one to meddle with ours.
“The gentleman remarked that he 'wasn't sent to ask when it would be done, but to get it now; and that if he couldn't get it by fair means he would take it by foul means.'”
This editorial captures the messy, personal, and often petty nature of early territorial governance in Olympia. Today's public records requests and legislative proceedings are governed by rigid transparency laws, but the underlying tension between state officials and those executing their work remains a constant in local politics.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.