The Front Street Bottleneck
A classic tale of early Seattle infrastructure, where a proposed bridge at Seneca Street was deemed 'a fifth wheel to a wagon' by a fed-up local editor.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Front street grade is going ahead slowly, but we are told that a large force will be put on in a few days and the work pushed ahead faster. A number of men are now at work trimming off the bank and finishing up the cut at Denny’s block, and a large force is employed in making a cut at the foot of Seneca street, across Front. This is being done, we are informed, preparatory to constructing a bridge across the street. But it appears to us that this bridge will, when completed, be very much like the fifth wheel to a wagon, as it can serve no possible purpose. It was proposed at one time to run Seneca street through under Front, 20 feet in the clear and 10 feet below the grade, but that injudicious plan was completely frustrated by well-founded objections that were raised by the property holders. Seneca should, and of course will be, filled up so as to intersect with Front street the same as University and Spring Streets, and in this event, a bridge at the place in question would be a nuisance, and would interfere with the intersection of the two streets. The only feasible plan, therefore, is to fill the foot of Seneca street up in the same manner that the filling was made at the foot of other streets intersecting with Front.
“But it appears to us that this bridge will, when completed, be very much like the fifth wheel to a wagon, as it can serve no possible purpose.”
The struggle to balance street grading, property owner pushback, and functional connectivity remains a hallmark of Seattle's civic history. Just as 1877 editors argued against 'nuisance' infrastructure, modern residents continue to debate the utility of major capital projects in the face of rapid urban expansion.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.