An Editor's Dilemma in the Civil War
The Olympia Standard defends its editorial stance against critics who charge the paper with abandoning the cause of the Union by questioning the immediate abolition of slavery.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
An effort is now being made by our enemies, aided by extreme Abolitionists, to injure us in the estimation of our Union friends of Republican antecedents, by creating the impression that we have changed our views upon the slavery question, as connected with the suppression of the rebellion and the restoration of the Union. In our comments upon the probable return of North Carolina to the Union, and as an inducement for their return, we expressed our approval of the policy which will probably be pursued of allowing the rebellious States to settle the question of slavery for themselves, with the understanding that they would adopt measures for its abolition in the course of ten or fifteen years. We also expressed our disapproval of a prosecution of the war for the purpose of securing the immediate and total extinction of slavery, whenever it is practicable to stop the further effusion of blood and restore the Union on the terms and conditions above indicated. We think it would be difficult to find an honest, reflecting man, North or South, who does not regard the institution of slavery as doomed to rapid extinction, after the Union shall be restored. A terrible responsibility will rest upon those who shall be instrumental in protracting the war by securing a rejection of such a basis of settlement whenever it shall be offered by the States now in rebellion.
“A terrible responsibility will rest upon those who shall be instrumental in protracting the war by securing a rejection of such a basis of settlement.”
This editorial reflects the intense, high-stakes ideological friction that defined the Civil War era, where local editors were forced to navigate the collapsing consensus of their own parties. Today, it highlights how regional political discourse in Washington State has always been deeply tethered to national crises and the shifting definitions of what 'Union' and 'loyalty' mean.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.