Same Streets
← All stories

The Midnight Death of Seattle’s Charter

When a judge declared the city’s incorporation invalid in 1877, the local newspaper editor went on the warpath to save the municipality from 'gratuitous anarchy.'

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

In deciding the case of the City of Seattle vs. H. L. Yesler, involving the validity of the assessment of property damaged by the Front Street grade, Judge Lewis took it upon himself to pronounce the act incorporating our city null and void. This opinion is based upon a strained interpretation of the wording of Section 1,839 of the U.S. Revised Statutes—a law having reference to private corporations and having for its object to deny to the Territorial Legislature any power to create private corporations or confer upon individuals any special privileges or immunities which would result in injustice or robbery upon the people. In so doing, he has not only perverted the plain meaning, but also the very language of the Statutes. The case in a nutshell is that the Act of the legislature incorporating this city was not a private charter within the purview of the U.S. statute, and hence it is not invalidated by that statute. Aggregations of several thousand people in one place must have some kind of a municipal organization. The city’s complex organization requires a system of its own, and in the case of institutions that have grown and developed, and where the property and security of our people are involved, it will require very expansive law—law that is founded in reason and common sense to effect the overthrow of the city’s life, and replace existing order by gratuitous anarchy.

“Aggregations of several thousand people in one place must have some kind of a municipal organization.”

— Printed in The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1877
Then · 1877149 years apartNow · 2026

This 1877 legal dust-up mirrors modern anxieties about the stability of municipal governance and the fragility of civic institutions. Just as Editor David Higgins fought to preserve Seattle’s structural legitimacy, today's residents continue to grapple with how municipal law dictates the physical and economic development of our growing city.

The original page

The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1877-02-21. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, FEB 21, 1877, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.61365, -122.34699 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗