The Ghost Fleet of the Pacific
Senator William Gwin rails against the government's refusal to fund military presence in the Pacific, leaving the coast vulnerable to 'filibusters' and privateers.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Senator Gwin rose in the Senate to demand information regarding the number of warships stationed on the Pacific coast of California, Oregon, and Washington. He argued that the administration’s 'miserable economy'—refusing to fund local defense or revenue steamers—had created a vacuum. He pointed to the recent 'filibuster' expeditions, where small groups of men took possession of foreign territories in Mexico and declared them republics, noting that a single gunship could have prevented these incursions. Gwin claimed the government was 'penny wise and pound foolish,' and that until the Pacific is adequately guarded, citizens will continue to take matters into their own hands when invited to conquer magnificent, undefended lands.
“This miserable economy had left them without government power either to defend themselves from an enemy, or to prevent the sailing of unlawful expeditions.”
Gwin’s frustration over the federal government’s neglect of the Pacific coast’s defense echoes the recurring, modern-day sentiment that Washington State is an afterthought in D.C. budget debates. His critique of 'miserable economy' in the name of national interest remains a central theme in the perpetual tug-of-war over public infrastructure and territorial security.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.