The Monopoly of Water: A Seattleite’s Outrage Over Yesler’s Wharf
In 1877, a local citizen confronted the city's most powerful industrialist over his claim to the waterfront, sparking a debate about public access and private power that echoes in Seattle today.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A MONOPOLY.
A certain portly looking citizen, who affects a somewhat dignified air, strolled down on yesterday's wharf, and while gazing about he chanced to espy a pile floating some distance off from the wharf. It was very calm at the time, and the pile could hardly be seen to vary from its position. He stood and pondered over it a while, something after the manner of Hamlet with Yorick's skull, and finally, turning to one of the workmen, he asked what that pile was driven way out there for.
"Oh," says the man, "that's the limit."
"The limit!" he muttered. "Yes, the limit; that marks the place where the wharf is to be terminated." He looked indignant for a moment, and then declared that it was a blasted outrage to monopolize the water front in that way. "Yesler," he said, "has been running that wharf out for the last twenty years, and, by thunder, he ought to stop where he is now."
This 1877 complaint about Henry Yesler’s monopolization of Seattle’s waterfront prefigures modern battles over public access to Puget Sound. Today, as developers and tech giants reshape the shoreline, the tension between private commercial interests and the public right to the water remains a central civic issue in Seattle.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.