The Patent War Over the Electric Bath Robe
A public spat between a Spokane physician and an local 'professor' reveals the cutthroat market for pseudo-scientific wellness devices.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Dr. J. M. Boyd of Spokane and Professor J. S. Galloway are engaged in a public dispute regarding the invention of an electric bath robe. Boyd claims Galloway is wrongfully handling his patent-protected switchboard and robe design, which he asserts is capable of magnetizing the entire body. Galloway has retaliated with a notice in the paper, claiming his own invention is superior, patentable, and not an infringement. Galloway promotes his device for treating rheumatism, gout, neuralgia, kidney trouble, and paralysis, urging patients to treat themselves at home rather than traveling to hot springs.
“I am willing to let the public judge as to the merits of my Electric bath robe and guarantee results or no pay is asked.”
This debate highlights the long-standing American obsession with 'miracle' health gadgets and the patent disputes that inevitably follow. While the technology has shifted from 'electric robes' to modern wellness apps and supplements, the promise of a cheap, at-home cure remains a powerful marketing engine.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.