The Science of 'Degeneracy' in the Courtroom
Tacoma experts describe the dubious medical pseudoscience used to argue insanity and 'degeneracy' in high-stakes murder trials.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
If your nose is not set straight on your face, if your ears extend out from your head too far, if your jaw is too pointed, if your mouth is too large, or if you have any one of a number of other odd marks, you can lay claim to symptoms of degeneracy. Degeneracy has come to be a common and successful defense in murder trials. All sorts of troubles, from insanity down to wasting diseases, demoralizing habits, and malformations of the head and body, are classed as producing or tending to produce degeneracy. Doctors have standards of perfection for the head, eyes, ears, nose, face, neck, trunk, and limbs. If a person measures above or below the limits, the doctors class him as having symptoms of degeneracy. The method of finding symptoms of degeneracy has been reduced to a science. Some physicians make a special study of degeneracy and these are usually called in murder trials to testify for or against the prisoner. This much and more doctors have stated on the witness stand in the criminal courts of Tacoma during important murder trials. Finding deformities of the body and defects of the mind, the experts suspect degeneracy; or, if there are enough marks, they pronounce the prisoner a degenerate or a maniac. By presenting facts of this kind to juries, the lawyers and doctors manage at times to have prisoners acquitted of murder or assault, or to have the penalty lessened.
“If your nose is not set straight on your face... you can lay claim to symptoms of degeneracy.”
This piece highlights the chilling history of phrenology and biological determinism in the criminal justice system. It serves as a reminder of how 'expert' testimony was once used to pathologize physical features to influence juries.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.