Same Streets
← All stories

The County Printing War: Seattle's Oldest Paper Claims Moral High Ground in Bid for Public Contracts

In May 1877, the publisher of Seattle’s leading newspaper defends his bid for county printing contracts against rivals who accused him of greed, arguing that 'the laborer is worthy of his hire' and that public money should support a responsible local press.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

THE COUNTY PRINTING.

As heretofore, the County Commissioners have again awarded us the public printing for another year, and this time at what may be considered fair and remunerative rates. That's right; and we believe the people of the county will so regard it, for the reason that they have been accustomed for the past ten or eleven years to look for the proceedings of the Board and all other county printing in this the oldest established paper in Seattle, and the one by far the most generally read of any in this Territory, and because of their just appreciation, not only of this paper but of the maxim that 'the laborer is worthy of his hire,' and of a just and ample compensation for what he does, whether employed by a private individual or the public.

Yet the publisher of our evening contemporary, who neglected to put in any bid for the printing himself, refers to us in no very flattering terms for happening at last to have succeeded in obtaining this work for about three-quarters of what we might legally charge for any advertising, in the absence of all express contract. There is no merit, however, in his criticisms upon our bid, or in his charge of exorbitancy by us, at the publisher of the Dispatch bid from 15 to 25 cents per square higher than ours—and the Times, if it had felt disposed to do the work cheaper, might have got it. But if it had, it would profit but very little from it—as under our contract, the total cost of the printing for the coming year, can't amount to over ten or twelve hundred dollars in scrip, including the tax list, if it does two-thirds of that sum.

For this man, in this contest, is wrong again in countenancing the idea that any newspaper should do the county or city printing for less than it should be charged any private individuals for the same amount of work. It should, on the contrary, as we most decidedly do, regard our City and County authorities as under an obligation which will always justify them in doing to the utmost what may be lawfully done in all of their local press, being the representatives as they are of that public in whose behalf that press is ever laboring and wielding a most beneficial influence.

Then · 1877149 years apartNow · 2026

This 1877 editorial reveals an early battle over municipal contracting and media independence. The publisher argues that newspapers deserve fair pay for their work, framing it as a matter of labor rights ('the laborer is worthy of his hire') rather than just business profit. It echoes modern debates about government transparency, the cost of public notices, and whether local news outlets should be compensated fairly for serving as the official record of civic governance.

The original page

The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, 1877-05-12. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Daily Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Territory [i.e. Wash.]) 1876-1881, MAY 12, 1877, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗