The Union Frisking Committee
Everett union members turn to direct enforcement of the union label, fining fellow workers who wear non-union clothing.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A union in this city in order to raise funds for the Hatters, who were on strike, as well as to impress a lesson on the minds of its members, adopted a frisking system, which worked well. In the midst of the business of the evening a committee would be suddenly appointed by the chair to inspect the hat of every member present. The unlucky owner of any hat not bearing the label was promptly fined a nominal sum and the amount so raised sent to the striking hatters. It might not be a bad idea to adopt the system in other unions and extend it to suits as well. No union man ought to wear a non-union garment but many of them do. In most cases it is because of thoughtlessness, or because the dealers tell them that the union garment is inferior in quality or higher priced.
“The man who purchases a non-union piece of goods when the same article made under union conditions is to be obtained, is just as surely aiding the enemy as the veriest strike breaker.”
This early 20th-century 'frisking' movement highlights the intense pressure for solidarity during the labor wars of the Progressive Era. While modern consumer activism relies more on digital boycotts and label transparency, the core tension remains: the individual's right to choose versus the group's demand for collective economic power.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.