Same Streets
← All stories

Warehouse Company Cleared in Apple Deal Suit

A legal dispute over the 1921 apple harvest ends in a significant win for the White Bluffs Warehouse Company, resulting in thousands of dollars in judgments.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

H. E. Robinson returned last Saturday morning from Prosser where he had been most of the week while the case of Dingfelder versus the White Bluffs Warehouse Company was being tried. Mr. Robinson was very much elated at the outcome of the case, for in addition to the $10,000 in notes that the Court ordered cancelled and returned to defendant, a judgment in the sum of $9,666.00 was entered in favor of the Warehouse Company. The suit grew out of the apple deal of 1921 and hinged upon the ability of the Warehouse Company to establish an agency relationship between H. D. Smith and Dingfelder.

“Mr. Robinson was very much elated at the outcome of the case.”

— Printed in White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, 1923
Then · 1923103 years apartNow · 2026

Agricultural litigation defined the economic life of the Columbia Basin in the early 20th century. This dispute mirrors the complex contractual and agency struggles that continue to shape modern agribusiness and fruit-packing operations in the region.

The original page

White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, 1923-05-25. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
White Bluffs Spokesman (White Bluffs, Wash.) 1907-1938, MAY 25, 1923, Page 1
Rights
Public domain
Place
46.66064, -119.47961 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗