The Great Debate: Freethought vs. Orthodoxy in Snohomish
A fiery public debate pits local skeptics against orthodox believers over the nature of God, the morality of the Bible, and the necessity of eternal hellfire.
In a spirited public debate held in Snohomish, Mr. Edwards and Mr. Edmunds squared off over the nature of religion and biblical authority. Mr. Edwards argued for the divine nature of the Bible as an infallible rule for faith, while Mr. Edmunds maintained that morality belongs to nature and science, not dogma. Mr. Edmunds argued that the concept of eternal hell was a barbaric holdover and that science provided a more rational guide to human conduct than church theology. The debate grew heated, with Mr. Edwards singing hymns and leading prayers, to which Mr. Edmunds responded by leading a mock prayer addressed to the Devil, claiming it to be as efficacious as his opponent's. A vote taken by the audience showed overwhelming support for Mr. Edmunds’ freethinking arguments, with nearly the entire crowd standing in his favor at the conclusion of the event.
“Thou infinite, incomprehensible and ever living Devil; thou ruler of all worlds and divine arbiter of all souls; thou art the true and only god of this world.”
This debate highlights the fierce public intellectualism of 19th-century Snohomish, where local residents packed halls to hash out the fundamental tension between religious dogma and emerging scientific secularism. Today’s town squares have largely replaced such formal theological debates with the polarized discourse of social media, but the underlying struggle to reconcile belief and reason remains a persistent civic thread.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.