Tacoma's Volunteer Firefighters Face Disbandment
A clash over civic spending and fire safety policy threatens to dissolve the city's volunteer fire department.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The volunteer fire department in Tacoma threatens to disband if the city council insists on Chief Lillis' plan to have them respond only to second alarms. The volunteers object to being called out only for major fires. Conversely, Chief Lillis argues the plan will save the city $3,000 to $4,000 annually. Volunteers claim that removing them would force the city to hire two additional permanent men per station, effectively doubling the expenses. The volunteers also accuse Lillis of attempting to consolidate power for political purposes.
“Tacoma has now one of the most efficient fire departments in the country, and the volunteers charge Lillis with desiring to have, regardless of expense, the first best department in the United States, while having all of its members under his control for political purposes.”
Municipal debates over public safety budgets versus professional staffing are a recurring struggle in city government. This tension between volunteer community service and professional, centrally-controlled municipal departments mirrors modern debates in fast-growing cities.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.