Treasurer Hill's Tax Blunder
A local civic scandal as the City Treasurer faces accusations of incompetence and overreach regarding delinquent tax sales.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Attention has been called to the blunder in the advertisement of the Treasurer offering for sale the property of delinquent city taxpayers. That blunder consisted of announcing the sale to occur on the 1st of April, which is a Sunday. The date of the treasurer's treasury sale is a matter of grave importance, a wrong date vitiating the proceeding. And yet, we are told, the treasurer is for going on with the sale be it right or wrong, legal or not. His fees, perhaps, depend upon completing the sale, and rather than lose them he may put the city in a position of great awkwardness. It is possible Treasurer Hill feels himself above the law. We are of the opinion that both treasurer and printer will lose their fees for the delinquent tax list of 1882.
“It is possible Treasurer Hill feels himself above the law.”
Public officials ignoring procedural law to secure their own fees or prioritize expedience remains a perennial theme in local governance and political accountability. The tension between the paper's editorial board and the City Treasurer highlights the long history of the Fourth Estate acting as a watchdog against perceived civic graft.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.