The Struggle for School Space
A call to stop patching the Snohomish public school and instead plan for the city's inevitable future growth.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Under the excellent management of our public school by the present teacher and her predecessor, the question of more school room is sprung by the large increase of students. We must meet and settle this in such a way that when a few months have passed, we shall not wake up to find that we have made as great a mistake in this as we did in the planning and building of the present school house. Mere room, in the sense that a farmer provides for his hay and grain, is not what will meet the requirements of this case. Every step we take now should look to the grading of our public school. A mere extension on the rear of the present building of thirty feet, giving us one school room of 20x30 feet, is not practicable; we should have at least two recitation rooms with one more general assembly room. Let us build a wing on the rear of the present building, projecting out on either side far enough to give the three rooms below; then let it be finished with a French attic roof, so as to give us the room above.
“Mere room, in the sense that a farmer provides for his hay and grain, is not what will meet the requirements of this case.”
Debates over how to balance rapid population growth with sustainable school infrastructure remain a perennial civic challenge in Snohomish County today, echoing this 1876 editorial's plea for long-term planning over short-term 'patchwork' solutions.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.