Frustration Mounts Over Hover Ferry Monopoly
The Commercial Club launches an investigation after travelers complain that the lack of competition has made the ferry operator indifferent to public needs.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In view of numerous complaints regarding the service provided by the Hover ferry, the Commercial Club has authorized a formal investigation. Dr. B. L. Cole and E. W. Trenbath were appointed to lead the inquiry. The latest complaint comes from the Seattle Automobile Chamber of Commerce, alleging that since the Wallula ferry ceased operations, the owner of the Hover ferry has become 'entirely too independent' and unaccommodating to the traveling public. The local club feels a sense of responsibility for the service, having promoted it as a superior alternative to the Wallula route.
“It is claimed that since the Wallula ferry went out of business the owner of the Hover ferry has become entirely too independent.”
This dispute over ferry service reflects the classic tension of a rural community dependent on limited infrastructure. Just as 1917 travelers grappled with the 'independence' of a monopoly operator, modern residents often face similar frustrations regarding public utilities and transit access in a rapidly growing region.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.