The Morning After: A Local Scandal Retraction
The Press-Times finds itself in an awkward tangle, celebrating its own bold reporting of a poisoning plot before immediately disavowing the accusations as 'too absurd for belief.'
The Press-Times displayed a bizarre lack of internal coordination yesterday. Under the headline 'Still We Lead,' it boasted of being the first to publish Dr. Jordan’s accusations that Mr. Lowman attempted to poison Mr. Yesler. However, in the very same column, under 'Editorial Points,' the paper backpedaled entirely: 'The charges made by Dr. Jordan... which we published yesterday as a matter of public news, are too absurd for belief.' It appears one editor was eager to claim credit for a scoop, while the other felt compelled to offer a groveling retraction regarding Mr. Lowman’s reputation. This public confession of error at least offers a glimmer of hope for our neighbor’s journalistic integrity.
“Is it glorifying in its shame or is it ashamed of its glory?”
This piece highlights the early days of sensationalism in Seattle media, where 'getting the story first' often superseded the 'truth.' The tension between click-bait style sensationalism and the legal necessity of retraction remains a defining feature of the modern digital news cycle.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.