The Battle for Tacoma's Water
A complex struggle unfolds as private interests and the city council clash over a million-dollar water contract.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
C. B. Talbot has offered to furnish Tacoma with 20 million gallons of pure mountain water daily for $852,500, a proposal that represents a potential saving of nearly $1.3 million compared to the current water plant purchase plans. Despite the massive implications for taxpayers, the city council has been quick to dismiss the offer, bundling it off to a committee without investigation. Critics argue that the council is being 'cinched' by existing water interests and that the city is being pushed into debt to acquire a failing plant at the expense of necessary sewer projects. Arguments rage over whether the city should own the utility or simply regulate the private company’s excessive rates, which are estimated to be two to five times higher than in other comparable cities.
“What the people really fear most is that not only their representatives in the city council, but that their home newspapers and some of their nominally leading citizens have prostituted their positions.”
The tension between public ownership of utilities, private profit, and the influence of 'dark money' in local government is a perennial feature of Washington politics. Tacoma's 1892 water wars mirror modern municipal debates over utility rates and the influence of corporations on city infrastructure projects.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.