The Struggle Over a Mother’s Custody
A local children's bureau official defends the controversial intervention into a family's life in the face of public criticism.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
To the Editor: Will you kindly allow me space to state the facts in the case of the State vs. Mrs. Bennett? Some ten days ago the police department asked whether there was not some way of rescuing a girl of 13 and a boy of 11 from being daily witnesses of their mother's shame, and of the girl from being forced into such a life herself. I visited the shack and found them living in one room in a condition of squalor that could hardly be described. The woman stolidly reported that she 'got her money in different ways.' Officer Harding reported drunken brawls and constant midnight orgies in this woman's abode. I found from the principal of the Denny school that the children had hardly attended school at all. One witness testified to seeing the mother, often accompanied by her 13-year-old daughter, on the streets with hard-looking men at late hours. We proceeded in the most energetic way possible to rescue these children from physical, intellectual, and moral contamination. I will not dilate upon the character of her witnesses—a stiff-on man, a sailor—nor of the composition of that particular jury, any more than to say that it was a 'hard times' jury. Surely the bureau cannot have any higher function than that of rescuing defenseless children.
“Surely the bureau cannot have any higher or more appropriate function than that of rescuing defenseless children.”
This letter from E. T. Dooley of the Children's Bureau highlights the early, aggressive era of social work in Seattle, where moralizing and 'rescue' interventions often clashed with the realities of poverty. It demonstrates the persistent tension between the state's desire to protect children and the individual liberty of families in crisis.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.