Railroad Giants Clash Over Seattle Terminals
The Northern Pacific Railroad rebuffs the Great Northern's hope for a union depot, signaling a fierce battle for control over Seattle's industrial waterfront.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In a speech before the board of aldermen, Judge Burke, counsel for the Great Northern Railway, stated that Mr. Hill hoped to get the Northern Pacific and Union Pacific to join him in building a union passenger station at Seattle on Jackson Street. However, Superintendent Kline of the Northern Pacific has formally notified the city council that his company has no intention of becoming a tenant of the Great Northern. He characterized the scheme as 'impracticable, ill-advised and inconsistent with the best interests of the city.' Meanwhile, uncertainty surrounds the future of regional steamer lines as rumors persist that the Northern Pacific is scaling back its maritime operations while other interests scramble to manage the Sound routes.
“The Northern Pacific railroad has always been willing to go into any fair terminal arrangement in the city of Seattle, but has no intention of becoming a tenant of the Great Northern company.”
The late 19th-century struggle for control of Seattle's transportation infrastructure and waterfront set the stage for the city's growth as a major rail hub. Today's debates over public-private partnerships in transit and land use for rail corridors echo these same power dynamics.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.