Same Streets
← All stories

The Great Legislative Mess of 1877

A scathing editorial reveals how Washington Territory lawmakers spent their time sight-seeing instead of legislating, resulting in a chaotic pile of 'undigested' laws.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Much of the business before the last session of the legislature was of a very important character. When it adjourned, it was hoped, if not generally believed, that in many important respects permanent improvements were made in the law. The business presented was in excess of the usual amount. Those who presented it belonged mainly to that class who have found much fault with our statutes for their numerous contradictions and inconsistent provisions. It was generally supposed that their labors were chiefly given to systematizing our laws, and removing these imperfections; yet we are sorry to be compelled to say that the Acts of 1877, when published, will present a worse general appearance and cause more confusion and humiliation among the people of the Territory than the statutes of any state or territory have ever effected since the American Union was first formed. When the Legislature convened, it was generally regarded that all the business likely to be presented could easily be done in the 40 days the law allowed. In place of doing so, for the first half of the session, a huge part of the time was spent traveling to Olympia and visiting various regions of the Sound. This important body seemed to avoid settling down to regular work before the last week of its session. Then, when too late to attempt to do well what absolutely needed to be done, the attempt was made to rush through an almost unlimited number of bills. The hurry of the session resulted in some 90 such rough drafts of bills being presented to the Governor. These were written with no more care than an attorney would take to prepare a memorandum of his argument at a place where he never designed that others would see or read it; with amendments all over these outlines of bills, some interlined, some pasted on the original draft of the bill, and many pinned to it; looking as if the opposing counsel had taken the attorney's brief, and with intent to ridicule it, had attached his comments to every part of it.

“The hurry of the session resulted in some 90 such rough drafts of bills... looking as if the opposing counsel had taken the attorney's brief, and with intent to ridicule it, had attached his comments to every part of it.”

— Printed in The Northern Star (Snohomish City, W.T. [Wash.]) 1876-1879, 1877
Then · 1877149 years apartNow · 2026

This 1877 editorial highlights a recurring frustration with government efficiency that resonates with today’s gridlocked legislative sessions. The 'rush to legislate' at the end of a session is a historical pattern that still challenges the quality and clarity of lawmaking in the modern era.

The original page

The Northern Star (Snohomish City, W.T. [Wash.]) 1876-1879, 1877-12-15. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Northern Star (Snohomish City, W.T. [Wash.]) 1876-1879, DEC 15, 1877, Page 4
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.03553, -122.90083 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗