City Council Faces Power Struggle over Board of Public Works
As two members are removed and vacancies persist, the Council weighs an unprecedented move to seize control of city infrastructure projects.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The house of delegates met last night to discuss the disturbed condition of the city government. Two members of the Board of Public Works have been removed, and the mayor's new nominees have not been confirmed. Delegate Drew argued that the council is clothed with power to step in, assume responsibility, and take action. He moved that a committee be appointed to potentially abrogate some offices. Other delegates, such as Mr. Goddard, warned that such a step would be a flagrant violation of the spirit of the charter, noting that the council's functions are purely legislative. Despite these concerns, a committee was appointed to investigate, and the council pushed through several ordinances for fire engine houses and street lights.
“It is evident to everybody that there was a disturbed condition in one of the branches of the city government.”
This power struggle captures a moment when Seattle was transitioning from a chaotic frontier town to a managed metropolis. The friction between executive appointments and legislative oversight is a perennial theme in Seattle's governance history.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.