Populist Insult Sparks Contempt Fine
A citizen confronted a judge on the street, accusing him of taking bribes, leading to an immediate court-ordered fine.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In the Superior court today P. J. Cowley, one of the most rampant of the local Populists, was fined $50 for contempt of court in having used language 'contemptuous and insolent' in airing a personal grievance against Judge Winn on the street last Saturday after the adjournment of court, the judge having just previously overruled a motion to advance a case in which Cowley is plaintiff and the Farmers' and Merchants' Insurance Company, defendants. Cowley brought suit in December to recover $1,500 insurance on his house, which was destroyed by fire last fall. Approaching the Judge upon the street, he insolently asked him how much the company paid him to defer the case. The Judge answered at first that he didn't understand him, whereupon a Populist chieftain said, 'Oh, yes, you are very damned innocent, ain't you?' Then the judge told him promptly that he would answer him in open court the first of this week, and he made answer today by imposing the fine.
“Oh, yes, you are very damned innocent, ain't you?”
This reflects the volatile political climate of the 1890s, where Populist anti-establishment rhetoric often clashed with the established judiciary. It highlights a time when the court’s authority was fiercely contested in public spaces.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.