The Ballard Rail Wars
Ballard officials threatened to forcibly remove tracks from their city streets in a bitter dispute with railroad receivers.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A communication from Thomas R. Brown, receiver of the Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway, to the city council of Ballard on Tuesday night announced that he could do nothing to fulfill the contract entered into with the Great Northern Railway Company to grade and improve Ballard Avenue, because there were no funds except to keep the road in its present condition. The Great Northern can do nothing to carry out the contract because the Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern occupies fifteen feet of its right-of-way. The city is therefore the sufferer, as the street is impassable for teams in its present condition. Councilman J. Keane wanted to revoke the franchise of the Seattle, Lake Shore & Eastern Railway. Mayor Peters informed him the road had no franchise, but claimed rights by possession before the town was incorporated. Keane then said, 'Let us take the rails and fire them bodily out. They are trespassers.'
“Let us take the rails and fire them bodily out. They are trespassers.”
This reflects the era's raw, often violent civic arguments over control of public land and infrastructure. Ballard, which was its own city until its 1907 annexation, consistently fought to maintain local control against the powerful railroad monopolies that defined the region’s growth.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.