Same Streets
← All stories

Double License, Double Trouble in Issaquah

When Gilman—now Issaquah—incorporated, its new council demanded a second liquor license from saloonkeepers who had already paid King County. The county prosecutor said he could not protect them or refund their money.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

The five saloon-keepers at Gilman—Isaac Cooper, Ben Gore, Louis Undine, George Davis and John Rowley—have made a demand upon the county commissioners for the return of $300 each, making a total of $1,500, which they paid into the treasury of King county last fall for the privilege of selling liquor for one year. Last fall the town of Gilman was not incorporated and the county commissioners granted licenses to the saloon-keepers on payment of the fee of $300 each. Three months ago the town of Gilman was incorporated and immediately an ordinance was passed giving the town absolute control of the liquor traffic. The town council simply ignored the licenses granted by the county and made a demand for the payment of a new license tax. The saloon-keepers absolutely refused to comply with the demand and were arrested and fined upon a charge of selling liquor without a license. The five saloon men were in communication with Prosecuting Attorney Miller yesterday and demanded protection from the Gilman town council. Mr. Miller says that the county cannot protect them from the town council, neither can the county hand back the money which they paid. The money, he argues, was paid under certain conditions and agreements which the present action of the Gilman council cannot legally change. Should an effort be made to prosecute the five saloon-keepers upon a state charge, Mr. Miller will refuse to file the complaints.

“The town council simply ignored the licenses granted by the county and made a demand for the payment of a new license tax.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

Municipal incorporation can rewrite local rules overnight, and fights over who gets to license and tax liquor are an old Washington story. Issaquah's modern identity was shaped by such boundary-and-tax disputes long before it became a Seattle suburb.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-07-20. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JUL 20, 1892, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.53488, -122.04330 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗