The Price of Credit in Snohomish
A legal summons from 1878 reveals the crushing weight of debt and high-interest loans for local businessmen.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In the District Court of Snohomish County, holding terms at Snohomish City, in and for said County of Snohomish, Washington Territory. E. D. Phelps and W. H. Wattleigh, partners, doing business under the style and firm name of Phelps & Wattleigh, Plaintiffs, vs. John L. Hurley and James Roberts, Defendants. To John L. Hurley and James Roberts: You are hereby required to appear in an action brought against you by the above named plaintiffs to recover the sum of Two Hundred and Forty-two 45-100 dollars, gold coin, on a certain promissory note signed by you and delivered to said plaintiffs. You must pay interest on said sum from November 12th, 1877, until paid, at the rate of one per cent per month in like gold coin, and for costs of suit. Failure to answer the complaint will result in a judgment by default.
“You are hereby required to appear in an action brought against you... to recover the sum of Two Hundred and Forty-two 45-100 dollars, gold coin.”
This 1878 debt suit highlights the persistent struggle of local small-business owners facing predatory interest rates and strict gold-standard repayment terms. It echoes contemporary anxieties about debt cycles and the fragility of local commerce in an economy dictated by distant financial mandates.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.