Same Streets
← All stories

The Populist Editor Who Saw Anarchy and Came Home to the Democrats

After a political murder and a season of lawlessness, F. F. Lischke renames his Sprague paper and renounces the People’s Party.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

F. F. Lischke, formerly editor of the Sprague Populist and an officer of the local Freeman’s Protective Silver Federation, didn’t know what Populism meant. The murder of Ginston and other lawless acts have opened his eyes. He has changed the name of his paper to the Democrat, and in his issue of August 6 says:

“In the eternal fitness of things, an explanation is in order, for the benefit of those whose mental calibre does not permit of their realizing why a person should drop a hot stove poker which he has accidentally grasped, remove a shoe that pinches or retreat from the brink of a yawning precipice. I have, in the past six months, sailed far out in the sea of Populism, and gazed into the seething vortex which in the very nature of things will be the future abiding place of the Populist party. On the voyage I discovered bloody billows of anarchy outlined on the horizon. I saw the angry breakers of prejudice, ignorance, injustice, cowardice and demagoguery beat against the bulwarks of the social fabric that surrounds all that which is held dear by the American people—liberty, patriotism, equality, fraternity and happiness. Having become thoroughly convinced that the Populist party is a menace to the perpetuity of our republic—a republic that is the outcome of over 100 years of popular will and statecraft—I have steered my bark away from the treacherous seas of Populism and am again anchored in the harbor of Democracy, where the beacon lights of Americanism cast their rays of conservativeness, statesmanship and loyalty over the children of this broad nation, and guide them up the incline of material and social progression. Hereafter I shall advocate the pure and undefiled principles of Democracy, which have been promulgated in the interests of the masses.

“I have started the Lincoln County Democrat on my own responsibility, in an endeavor to atone for my mistake in embracing Populism—to atone by presenting to the people of this county a paper that will point out to those who have been ensnared into the Populist fold, the fallacy of the Third Party doctrines. I have received no aid or encouragement from any source; should the Democracy see fit to aid this paper as proof of its merits, their aid will be appreciated.”

“I saw the angry breakers of prejudice, ignorance, injustice, cowardice and demagoguery beat against the bulwarks of the social fabric.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

Third-party movements and newspaper partisanship were tangled in 1890s Washington; an editor could change the name of his paper and, with it, his political identity. The murder he cites also reminds us that political rhetoric then, as now, could shade into real violence.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-08-11. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, AUG 11, 1894, Page 4
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗