The Paperwork That Couldn’t Save Chung We Long
A Seattle federal commissioner orders a Chinese laborer deported after testimony places him in Victoria, exposing the impossible “continuous residence” rules of the Chinese Exclusion Act.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Chung We Long was ordered deported to China yesterday by United States Commissioner Emery. Long had a registration certificate, but it was obtained by fraud, the commissioner found. The evidence showed that Long had not been a resident of the United States continuously for twelve years, as the law required.
Testimony established that he had resided and worked in a hotel in Victoria two years earlier, which showed clearly that he had not lived in the United States continuously. Long had lived in Washington at intervals for ten years, but even if he had been here since 1882 he would have had to reside here all the time to be allowed to remain. Commissioner Emery therefore ordered him deported. Long will be placed on the next Chinese steamer and transported back to his native land.
“Long had lived in Washington at intervals for ten years, but even if he had been here since 1882 he would have had to reside here all the time to be allowed to remain.”
Chinese exclusion turned ordinary life into a paperwork trap: a man who had lived in Washington for a decade could be deported because he had worked in Victoria and broken the fiction of “continuous” U.S. residence. The case echoes today’s fights over documentation, continuity and who gets to belong.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.