Same Streets
← All stories

The Great Horticultural Graft

A scathing editorial from The Ranch magazine accuses the state legislature of creating a bloated, ineffective bureaucracy under the guise of agricultural protection.

During the early days, the horticultural board got in its graft on the treasury for $5,000 to $10,000 per annum. The political upheaval of '96 ousted the board, and the law was changed so that fruit growers in each county could have a fruit inspector appointed. The state commissioner received $1,000 per annum and $500 expenses, and the county inspectors $2 per day. The last session of the legislature, however, amended the horticultural law, doubling the commissioner's salary and raising county inspector pay to $4 per day plus expenses. There are now twenty-five county inspectors, and when all 38 counties are supplied, the total cost to taxpayers will reach $61,000 annually. The Ranch asserts that the whole scheme of protection by county inspectors is a farce. There is not a district in the state where fruit interests have been successfully shielded by these gentlemen. In sections where fruit growing is carried on on a commercial scale, orchardists spray their trees and find immunity from pests—not by reason of the vigilance of the inspectors, but because it is a business proposition. The system is valueless, and a raw political graft.

“The Ranch asserts that the whole scheme of protection by county inspectors is worthless and a farce.”

— Printed in The Ranch (Seattle, Wash.) 1902-1914, 1903
Then · 1903123 years apartNow · 2026

This 1903 critique of 'political graft' in agricultural oversight mirrors modern debates over the efficacy of state-funded regulatory boards and the tension between industry self-regulation and government intervention. The skepticism toward 'inspector' jobs as patronage positions remains a recurring theme in Washington state civic discourse.

The original page

The Ranch (Seattle, Wash.) 1902-1914, 1903-06-01. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Ranch (Seattle, Wash.) 1902-1914, JUN 1, 1903, Page 6
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗