The Courthouse Math Behind a Judge-Shrinking Plan
Tacoma officials weigh merging the Pierce and Thurston judicial districts to save $10,000 a year, even as prosecutors ask for more help.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
TACOMA, Jan. 12.—Special.—By way of pruning expenses in this county it has been proposed to have one of the superior court judges act for Thurston county, and make Thurston and Pierce one judicial district. At present there are three superior court judges in this county, and notwithstanding the desire to curtail expenses the prosecuting attorney is arranging for two assistants. Senator Taylor has proposed the Thurston-Pierce judicial district to Member Scobey of the former county, and he reports Mr. Scobey as favoring the proposition. It had previously been proposed to place Kitsap and Pierce under one judicial district, and Senator Taylor says when he broached the proposition to Member Brown of Kitsap, he expressed himself in favor of it. As the state bears half the expense of the superior judgeships, Mr. Taylor says the Thurston-Pierce proposition would result in a saving of $10,000 per year to both, and would not at the same time appear as if the number of judges now acting would be cut down.
Prosecuting Attorney Coiner claims that with 871 cases in Pierce county last year, as against 759 in King county, the expense in Pierce county was 29 per cent less than in King, and that two assistants are allowed the King county prosecuting attorney.
“As the state bears half the expense of the superior judgeships, Mr. Taylor says the Thurston-Pierce proposition would result in a saving of $10,000 per year to both.”
Court consolidation is an old argument: rural and urban counties have long debated whether shared judgeships save money or shortchange local justice. The same tension persists in modern Washington, where caseloads, court funding and regional representation still drive judicial-boundary fights.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.