Same Streets
← All stories

Tacoma Beats the Railroad Over Its Own Waterfront

The U.S. Supreme Court dismisses Northern Pacific's bid to stop harbor lines along Tacoma's waterfront, handing the city a victory over the railroad's claim to 200 feet on each side of its track.

The supreme court of the United States has just rendered an important decision affecting the city of Tacoma. The Northern Pacific undertook to restrain the harbor line commission from establishing harbor lines in the city of Tacoma, claiming that under their grant they were entitled to 200 feet on each side of the track, which runs along the water front of Tacoma. The supreme court set aside the restraining order of the lower court and ordered the bill of the railroad company dismissed. This is indeed a victory for Tacoma.

“The supreme court set aside the restraining order of the lower court and ordered the bill of the railroad company dismissed. This is indeed a victory for Tacoma.”

— Printed in Aberdeen Herald (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

The fight over who controls Tacoma's shoreline—a city, a commission, or a railroad—is an old one. The same questions about public access and private claims to the water's edge still shape debates over ports, rail corridors, and waterfront redevelopment.

The original page

Aberdeen Herald (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1894-03-08. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Aberdeen Herald (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, MAR 8, 1894, Page 2
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.24550, -122.43833 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗