Same Streets
← All stories

A Two-Year Railroad Fight Ends with a $6,000 Check

After two years in court, H. M. Lund's property dispute with the Idaho & Washington Northern ends in a buyout; his hardware store will move to Washington Avenue and the old building will come down.

After a jury had been empaneled ready to proceed with the trial this morning, the case of H. M. Lund versus the Idaho & Washington Northern Railroad was settled out of court at Colville last evening. The railroad company agreed to buy the property in dispute for the sum of $6,000.

This case has been hanging fire in the courts since the entry into this city of the railroad in October 1907. At that time Mr. Lund applied to the Superior Court of this county for an injunction restraining the company from operating trains over its tracks in front of his store on Fourth Street until settlement had been made with him. The company appealed to the Supreme Court of the state from the decision of the Superior Court, but the Supreme Court held that the injunction was proper and gave the company thirty days in which to institute condemnation proceedings against the property. This was done, and the case has been set for hearing several times, being postponed for various reasons.

Mr. Lund's contention that his business property was damaged by the nearness of the railroad tracks would certainly have been sustained by the courts, and the settlement out of court is doubtless fair and more satisfactory to both parties to the contention. The Lund Hardware Company had already planned to remove from the old site and has under way a modern building on Washington Avenue. The railroad company will doubtless remove the old building, which will give the public a better view of approaching trains and lessen the hazard at this crossing.

The following from Newport were at Colville this week to give testimony in the case: Mr. and Mrs. Lund, C. A. Fiedler, F. C. Jones, C. F. Craig, John Koch, C. E. Smith, Jacob Martin, J. C. Grover, Edward Britton, J. R. Patterson, Chas. Freeman.

“Mr. Lund's contention that his business property was damaged by the nearness of the railroad tracks would certainly have been sustained by the courts...”

— Printed in The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1909
Then · 1909117 years apartNow · 2026

Property owners facing railroad and infrastructure condemnations still bargain over noise, access and safety at crossings. Newport's old Fourth Street dispute is a reminder that the cost of a railroad is never only the steel — it is also the storefronts in its path.

The original page

The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1909-10-07. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, OCT 7, 1909, Page 1
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.17963, -117.04326 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗